Mercedes-Benz E63 vs Saab 9-3 Vector

The 9-3 Vector costs less to run, by the official figures: about $10 a year less in New Zealand and $10 in Australia.

Mercedes-Benz E63

Side by side

Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.

Mercedes-Benz E63Saab 9-3 Vector

A typical year's fuel

New Zealand
$3,127
$3,121 (better)
Australia
$2,589
$2,584 (better)
United Kingdom
£1,900
£1,896 (better)
United States
$2,416
$2,411 (better)

Official figures

Uses
9.7 L/100km
9.7 L/100km (better)
UK
29 mpg
29 mpg (better)
US
24 mpg
24 mpg (better)
On a full tank
683 km
–

Space

Seats
5
–
Length
4,989 mm
–

Engine

Engine
4.0 L V8 twin-turbo petrol
–
Power
450 kW
–
Torque
850 Nm
–
Gearbox
9-speed automatic
–
Drive
AWD
–

Safety

ANCAP
★★★★★
–

A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.

E63 or 9-3 Vector?

Which is cheaper to run, the Mercedes-Benz E63 or the Saab 9-3 Vector?

The Saab 9-3 Vector: about $10 a year less in New Zealand and $10 in Australia than the Mercedes-Benz E63 at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.

Which uses less fuel, the Mercedes-Benz E63 or the Saab 9-3 Vector?

The Saab 9-3 Vector, at 9.7 L/100km (29 mpg UK, 24 mpg US) to the Mercedes-Benz E63's 9.7 L/100km (29 mpg UK, 24 mpg US), by their latest official figures.

Each on its own

Other comparisons

What will the drive cost?

Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.

Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads

The Roadtrip app showing a drive into London that costs £4.81 each, with fuel prices along the way