Kia Optima vs McLaren Artura

Official fuel use, running costs and specs, side by side.

Kia Optima

Side by side

Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.

Kia OptimaMcLaren Artura

A typical year's fuel

New Zealand
$1,811 (better)
$1,814
Australia
$1,498 (better)
$1,501
United Kingdom
£1,100 (better)
£1,102
United States
$1,399 (better)
$1,402

Official figures

Uses
5.6 L/100km (better)
5.6 L/100km
UK
50 mpg (better)
50 mpg
US
42 mpg (better)
42 mpg
On a full tank
1,071 km
–

Space

Seats
5
–
Boot
450 L
–
Length
4,905 mm
–
Weight
1,460 kg
–

Engine

Engine
2.5 L 4-cylinder petrol
–
Power
142 kW
–
Torque
246 Nm
–
Gearbox
8-speed automatic
–
Drive
FWD
–

Safety

ANCAP
★★★★★
–
Euro NCAP
★★★★★
–
Airbags
6
–

A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.

Optima or Artura?

Which uses less fuel, the Kia Optima or the McLaren Artura?

The Kia Optima, at 5.6 L/100km (50 mpg UK, 42 mpg US) to the McLaren Artura's 5.6 L/100km (50 mpg UK, 42 mpg US), by their latest official figures.

Each on its own

Other comparisons

What will the drive cost?

Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.

Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads

The Roadtrip app showing a drive into London that costs £4.81 each, with fuel prices along the way