KGM Rexton vs Mazda Bongo
The Rexton costs less to run, by the official figures: about $570 a year less in New Zealand.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- New Zealand
- $2,273 (better)
- $2,846
- Australia
- $2,805
- $2,354 (better)
- United Kingdom
- £1,986
- £1,729 (better)
- United States
- $3,142
- $2,199 (better)
Official figures
- Uses
- 8.8 L/100km
- 8.8 L/100km (better)
- UK
- 32 mpg
- 32 mpg (better)
- US
- 27 mpg
- 27 mpg (better)
Space
- Seats
- –
- 3
Engine
- Engine
- –
- 2.2 L 4-cylinder turbo diesel
- Gearbox
- –
- 5-speed manual
- Drive
- –
- RWD
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
Rexton or Bongo?
Which is cheaper to run, the KGM Rexton or the Mazda Bongo?
The KGM Rexton: about $570 a year less in New Zealand than the Mazda Bongo at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.
Which uses less fuel, the KGM Rexton or the Mazda Bongo?
The Mazda Bongo, at 8.8 L/100km (32 mpg UK, 27 mpg US) to the KGM Rexton's 8.8 L/100km (32 mpg UK, 27 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
