Holden Colorado vs SsangYong Rhino

The Colorado costs less to run, by the official figures: about $570 a year less in New Zealand.

Holden Colorado

Side by side

Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.

Holden ColoradoSsangYong Rhino

A typical year's fuel

New Zealand
$2,219 (better)
$2,784
Australia
$2,738
$2,303 (better)
United Kingdom
£1,939
£1,692 (better)
United States
$3,068
$2,151 (better)

Official figures

Uses
8.6 L/100km
8.6 L/100km (better)
UK
33 mpg
33 mpg (better)
US
27 mpg
27 mpg (better)
On a full tank
882 km
–

Space

Seats
5
–
Towing, braked
3,500 kg
–
Length
5,347 mm
–
Weight
1,972 kg
–

Engine

Engine
2.8 L 4-cylinder turbo-diesel
–
Power
147 kW
–
Torque
500 Nm
–
Gearbox
6-speed automatic
–
Drive
4WD
–

Safety

ANCAP
★★★★★
–
Airbags
7
–

A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.

Colorado or Rhino?

Which is cheaper to run, the Holden Colorado or the SsangYong Rhino?

The Holden Colorado: about $570 a year less in New Zealand than the SsangYong Rhino at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.

Which uses less fuel, the Holden Colorado or the SsangYong Rhino?

The SsangYong Rhino, at 8.6 L/100km (33 mpg UK, 27 mpg US) to the Holden Colorado's 8.6 L/100km (33 mpg UK, 27 mpg US), by their latest official figures.

Each on its own

Other comparisons

What will the drive cost?

Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.

Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads

The Roadtrip app showing a drive into London that costs £4.81 each, with fuel prices along the way