Ford Taurus vs Lincoln Continental
The Continental costs less to run, by the official figures: about $200 a year less in New Zealand, $170 in Australia, £120 in the UK and $150 in the US.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- New Zealand
- $4,004
- $3,803 (better)
- Australia
- $3,317
- $3,151 (better)
- United Kingdom
- £2,432
- £2,310 (better)
- United States
- $3,093
- $2,938 (better)
Official figures
- Uses
- 12.4 L/100km
- 11.8 L/100km (better)
- UK
- 23 mpg
- 24 mpg (better)
- US
- 19 mpg
- 20 mpg (better)
- On a full tank
- 574 km
- 833 km (better)
Space
- Seats
- 5
- 6
- Boot
- 569 L
- –
- Length
- 5,154 mm
- –
- Weight
- 1,862 kg
- –
Engine
- Engine
- 3.5 L V6 petrol
- 7.5 L V8 petrol
- Power
- 197 kW (better)
- 160 kW
- Torque
- 355 Nm
- –
- Gearbox
- 6-speed automatic
- 3-speed automatic
- Drive
- FWD
- RWD
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
Taurus or Continental?
Which is cheaper to run, the Ford Taurus or the Lincoln Continental?
The Lincoln Continental: about $200 a year less in New Zealand, $170 in Australia, £120 in the UK and $150 in the US than the Ford Taurus at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.
Which uses less fuel, the Ford Taurus or the Lincoln Continental?
The Lincoln Continental, at 11.8 L/100km (24 mpg UK, 20 mpg US) to the Ford Taurus's 12.4 L/100km (23 mpg UK, 19 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
