Ford Puma vs Renault Lutecia
The Puma costs less to run, by the official figures: about $10 a year less in New Zealand and $10 in Australia.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- New Zealand
- $1,814 (better)
- $1,821
- Australia
- $1,501 (better)
- $1,507
- United Kingdom
- £1,102 (better)
- £1,106
- United States
- $1,402 (better)
- $1,407
Official figures
- Uses
- 5.6 L/100km (better)
- 5.6 L/100km
- UK
- 50 mpg (better)
- 50 mpg
- US
- 42 mpg (better)
- 42 mpg
- On a full tank
- 749 km
- –
Space
- Seats
- 5
- –
- Boot
- 456 L
- –
- Length
- 4,186 mm
- –
- Weight
- 1,280 kg
- –
Engine
- Engine
- 1.0 L 3-cylinder turbo petrol mild hybrid
- –
- Power
- 92 kW
- –
- Torque
- 170 Nm
- –
- Gearbox
- 6-speed manual
- –
- Drive
- FWD
- –
Safety
- ANCAP
- ★★★★★
- –
- Euro NCAP
- ★★★★★
- –
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
Puma or Lutecia?
Which is cheaper to run, the Ford Puma or the Renault Lutecia?
The Ford Puma: about $10 a year less in New Zealand and $10 in Australia than the Renault Lutecia at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.
Which uses less fuel, the Ford Puma or the Renault Lutecia?
The Ford Puma, at 5.6 L/100km (50 mpg UK, 42 mpg US) to the Renault Lutecia's 5.6 L/100km (50 mpg UK, 42 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
