Ford Everest vs Nissan Kicks
The Everest costs less to run, by the official figures: about $530 a year less in New Zealand.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- New Zealand
- $2,008 (better)
- $2,535
- Australia
- $2,478
- $2,097 (better)
- United Kingdom
- £1,755
- £1,540 (better)
- United States
- $2,776
- $1,959 (better)
Official figures
- Uses
- 7.8 L/100km (better)
- 7.8 L/100km
- UK
- 36 mpg (better)
- 36 mpg
- US
- 30 mpg (better)
- 30 mpg
- On a full tank
- 1,026 km (better)
- 523 km
Space
- Seats
- 7
- 5
- Boot
- 450 L
- –
- Towing, braked
- 3,500 kg
- –
- Length
- 4,914 mm
- 4,295 mm
- Weight
- 2,475 kg
- 1,170 kg
Engine
- Engine
- 3.0 L V6 turbo diesel
- 1.6 L 4-cylinder petrol
- Power
- 184 kW (better)
- 90 kW
- Torque
- 600 Nm (better)
- 155 Nm
- Gearbox
- 10-speed automatic
- CVT
- Drive
- 4WD
- FWD
Safety
- ANCAP
- ★★★★★
- –
- Airbags
- 9
- –
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
Everest or Kicks?
Which is cheaper to run, the Ford Everest or the Nissan Kicks?
The Ford Everest: about $530 a year less in New Zealand than the Nissan Kicks at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.
Which uses less fuel, the Ford Everest or the Nissan Kicks?
The Ford Everest, at 7.8 L/100km (36 mpg UK, 30 mpg US) to the Nissan Kicks's 7.8 L/100km (36 mpg UK, 30 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
