Ford EcoSport vs Renault Scenic Ii

The Scenic Ii costs less to run, by the official figures: about $880 a year less in New Zealand, $720 in Australia, £530 in the UK and $680 in the US.

Side by side

Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.

Ford EcoSportRenault Scenic Ii

A typical year's fuel

New Zealand
$3,043
$2,167 (better)
Australia
$2,517
$1,795 (better)
United Kingdom
£1,849
£1,316 (better)
United States
$2,351
$1,674 (better)

Official figures

Uses
9.4 L/100km
6.7 L/100km (better)
UK
30 mpg
42 mpg (better)
US
25 mpg
35 mpg (better)

A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.

EcoSport or Scenic Ii?

Which is cheaper to run, the Ford EcoSport or the Renault Scenic Ii?

The Renault Scenic Ii: about $880 a year less in New Zealand, $720 in Australia, £530 in the UK and $680 in the US than the Ford EcoSport at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.

Which uses less fuel, the Ford EcoSport or the Renault Scenic Ii?

The Renault Scenic Ii, at 6.7 L/100km (42 mpg UK, 35 mpg US) to the Ford EcoSport's 9.4 L/100km (30 mpg UK, 25 mpg US), by their latest official figures.

Each on its own

Other comparisons

What will the drive cost?

Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.

Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads

The Roadtrip app showing a drive into London that costs £4.81 each, with fuel prices along the way