Ford EcoSport vs Holden Acadia
The Acadia costs less to run, by the official figures: about $20 a year less in New Zealand, $20 in Australia, £10 in the UK and $20 in the US.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- New Zealand
- $3,043
- $3,021 (better)
- Australia
- $2,517
- $2,499 (better)
- United Kingdom
- £1,849
- £1,835 (better)
- United States
- $2,351
- $2,334 (better)
Official figures
- Uses
- 9.4 L/100km
- 9.3 L/100km (better)
- UK
- 30 mpg
- 30 mpg (better)
- US
- 25 mpg
- 25 mpg (better)
- On a full tank
- –
- 782 km
Space
- Seats
- –
- 7
- Length
- –
- 4,979 mm
- Weight
- –
- 1,950 kg
Engine
- Engine
- –
- 3.6 L V6 petrol
- Power
- –
- 231 kW
- Torque
- –
- 367 Nm
- Gearbox
- –
- 9-speed automatic
- Drive
- –
- AWD
Safety
- ANCAP
- –
- ★★★★★
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
EcoSport or Acadia?
Which is cheaper to run, the Ford EcoSport or the Holden Acadia?
The Holden Acadia: about $20 a year less in New Zealand, $20 in Australia, £10 in the UK and $20 in the US than the Ford EcoSport at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.
Which uses less fuel, the Ford EcoSport or the Holden Acadia?
The Holden Acadia, at 9.3 L/100km (30 mpg UK, 25 mpg US) to the Ford EcoSport's 9.4 L/100km (30 mpg UK, 25 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
