Fisker Ocean vs Tesla Cybertruck

The Ocean costs less to run, by the official figures: about $10 a year less in New Zealand, $10 in Australia and $10 in the US.

Side by side

Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.

Fisker OceanTesla Cybertruck

A typical year's fuel

New Zealand
$1,139 (better)
$1,145
Australia
$973 (better)
$978
United Kingdom
£739 (better)
£743
United States
$1,038 (better)
$1,044

Official figures

Uses
26.6 kWh/100km (better)
26.7 kWh/100km
UK
2.3 mi/kWh (better)
2.3 mi/kWh
US
79 MPGe (better)
78 MPGe
Range
371 km
523 km (better)

A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.

Ocean or Cybertruck?

Which is cheaper to run, the Fisker Ocean or the Tesla Cybertruck?

The Fisker Ocean: about $10 a year less in New Zealand, $10 in Australia and $10 in the US than the Tesla Cybertruck at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.

Each on its own

Other comparisons

What will the drive cost?

Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.

Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads

The Roadtrip app showing a drive into London that costs £4.81 each, with fuel prices along the way