Fiat Bravo vs Nissan Almera
The Bravo costs less to run, by the official figures: about $1,520 a year less in New Zealand, $1,260 in Australia, £920 in the UK and $1,170 in the US.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- New Zealand
- $647 (better)
- $2,167
- Australia
- $536 (better)
- $1,795
- United Kingdom
- £393 (better)
- £1,316
- United States
- $500 (better)
- $1,674
Official figures
- Uses
- 2.0 L/100km (better)
- 6.7 L/100km
- UK
- 141 mpg (better)
- 42 mpg
- US
- 118 mpg (better)
- 35 mpg
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
Bravo or Almera?
Which is cheaper to run, the Fiat Bravo or the Nissan Almera?
The Fiat Bravo: about $1,520 a year less in New Zealand, $1,260 in Australia, £920 in the UK and $1,170 in the US than the Nissan Almera at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.
Which uses less fuel, the Fiat Bravo or the Nissan Almera?
The Fiat Bravo, at 2.0 L/100km (141 mpg UK, 118 mpg US) to the Nissan Almera's 6.7 L/100km (42 mpg UK, 35 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
