Chevrolet Equinox vs Mitsubishi Outlander
Official fuel use, running costs and specs, side by side.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- New Zealand
- $2,927
- $2,927
- Australia
- $2,423
- $2,421 (better)
- United Kingdom
- £1,778
- £1,778
- United States
- $2,261
- $2,261
Official figures
- Uses
- 9.1 L/100km
- 9.1 L/100km
- UK
- 31 mpg
- 31 mpg
- US
- 26 mpg
- 26 mpg
- On a full tank
- 623 km (better)
- 608 km
Space
- Seats
- 5
- 5
- Boot
- 846 L (better)
- 485 L
- Towing, braked
- 680 kg
- 1,600 kg (better)
- Length
- 4,650 mm
- 4,710 mm
- Weight
- 1,485 kg
- 1,635 kg
Engine
- Engine
- 1.5 L turbocharged 4-cylinder petrol
- 2.5 L naturally aspirated 4-cylinder petrol
- Power
- 127 kW
- 135 kW (better)
- Torque
- 275 Nm (better)
- 244 Nm
- Gearbox
- 6-speed automatic
- CVT (8 simulated steps)
- Drive
- FWD
- FWD
Safety
- ANCAP
- ★★★★★
- ★★★★★
- Euro NCAP
- –
- ★★★★★
- Airbags
- 6
- 8 (better)
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
Equinox or Outlander?
Which has the bigger boot, the Chevrolet Equinox or the Mitsubishi Outlander?
The Chevrolet Equinox, at 846 L to the Mitsubishi Outlander's 485 L, for their newest versions.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
