BMW XM vs Omoda O9
The O9 costs less to run, by the official figures: about $190 a year less in New Zealand, $160 in Australia, £120 in the UK and $150 in the US.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- New Zealand
- $647
- $453 (better)
- Australia
- $535
- $375 (better)
- United Kingdom
- £393
- £275 (better)
- United States
- $500
- $350 (better)
Official figures
- Uses
- 2.0 L/100km
- 1.4 L/100km (better)
- UK
- 141 mpg
- 202 mpg (better)
- US
- 118 mpg
- 168 mpg (better)
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
XM or O9?
Which is cheaper to run, the BMW XM or the Omoda O9?
The Omoda O9: about $190 a year less in New Zealand, $160 in Australia, £120 in the UK and $150 in the US than the BMW XM at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.
Which uses less fuel, the BMW XM or the Omoda O9?
The Omoda O9, at 1.4 L/100km (202 mpg UK, 168 mpg US) to the BMW XM's 2.0 L/100km (141 mpg UK, 118 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
