BMW 525D vs Ford Puma
The 525D costs less to run, by the official figures: about $450 a year less in New Zealand.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- New Zealand
- $1,364 (better)
- $1,814
- Australia
- $1,684
- $1,501 (better)
- United Kingdom
- £1,192
- £1,102 (better)
- United States
- $1,886
- $1,402 (better)
Official figures
- Uses
- 5.3 L/100km (better)
- 5.6 L/100km
- UK
- 53 mpg (better)
- 50 mpg
- US
- 44 mpg (better)
- 42 mpg
- On a full tank
- –
- 749 km
Space
- Seats
- –
- 5
- Boot
- –
- 456 L
- Length
- –
- 4,186 mm
- Weight
- –
- 1,280 kg
Engine
- Engine
- –
- 1.0 L 3-cylinder turbo petrol mild hybrid
- Power
- –
- 92 kW
- Torque
- –
- 170 Nm
- Gearbox
- –
- 6-speed manual
- Drive
- –
- FWD
Safety
- ANCAP
- –
- ★★★★★
- Euro NCAP
- –
- ★★★★★
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
525D or Puma?
Which is cheaper to run, the BMW 525D or the Ford Puma?
The BMW 525D: about $450 a year less in New Zealand than the Ford Puma at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.
Which uses less fuel, the BMW 525D or the Ford Puma?
The BMW 525D, at 5.3 L/100km (53 mpg UK, 44 mpg US) to the Ford Puma's 5.6 L/100km (50 mpg UK, 42 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
