Audi TT vs Nissan NV200 Cargo Van
The TT costs less to run, by the official figures: about $120 a year less in New Zealand, $90 in Australia, £70 in the UK and $90 in the US.
Side by side
Specs are for each car's newest version. The better figure is in green.
A typical year's fuel
- New Zealand
- $2,927 (better)
- $3,043
- Australia
- $2,425 (better)
- $2,519
- United Kingdom
- £1,778 (better)
- £1,849
- United States
- $2,261 (better)
- $2,351
Official figures
- Uses
- 9.1 L/100km (better)
- 9.4 L/100km
- UK
- 31 mpg (better)
- 30 mpg
- US
- 26 mpg (better)
- 25 mpg
- On a full tank
- 552 km
- –
Space
- Seats
- 4
- –
- Boot
- 305 L
- –
- Length
- 4,191 mm
- –
- Weight
- 1,280 kg
- –
Engine
- Engine
- 2.0 L 4-cylinder turbo petrol
- –
- Power
- 145 kW
- –
- Torque
- 320 Nm
- –
- Gearbox
- 7-speed S tronic automatic
- –
- Drive
- FWD
- –
A typical year: New Zealand 11,000 km (Ministry of Transport's average for a light vehicle); Australia 11,100 km (ABS Survey of Motor Vehicle Use average); United Kingdom 11,265 km (DfT National Travel Survey average of about 7,000 miles); United States 21,726 km (FHWA average of about 13,500 miles). Real costs depend on how and where you drive. Work out a particular trip.
TT or NV200 Cargo Van?
Which is cheaper to run, the Audi TT or the Nissan NV200 Cargo Van?
The Audi TT: about $120 a year less in New Zealand, $90 in Australia, £70 in the UK and $90 in the US than the Nissan NV200 Cargo Van at today's average prices and a typical year's driving.
Which uses less fuel, the Audi TT or the Nissan NV200 Cargo Van?
The Audi TT, at 9.1 L/100km (31 mpg UK, 26 mpg US) to the Nissan NV200 Cargo Van's 9.4 L/100km (30 mpg UK, 25 mpg US), by their latest official figures.
Each on its own
Other comparisons
What will the drive cost?
Roadtrip works out the fuel or charging cost of any drive for your exact car, finds the cheapest stations on the way, and splits it between everyone in the car.
Rated 4.7 by drivers · 700,000 downloads
